Lo sagrado y la violencia en el ecosistema de comunicación digital

Isaac Nahón Serfaty

doi:10.26422/aucom.2025.1402.nah

Isaac Nahón Serfaty University of Ottawa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26422/aucom.2025.1402.nah

Palavras-chave: religião, mito, ecologia, redes digitais, sagrado, profano, violência

Resumo

As categorias do sagrado e da violência estão no centro do pensamento de René Girard. Tanto a sua teoria do “bode expiatório” como a sua visão da relação indissolúvel entre o sagrado e a violência servem como chaves conceituais para estudar a comunicação em plataformas digitais, especialmente na perspectiva de uma difusão exuberante do visualmente grotesco e do enjoativamente sentimental. na estética das redes digitais. Neste artigo propomos o desenvolvimento de um esquema teórico que permita uma leitura neomítica e neo-religiosa da comunicação no ecossistema digital, , bem como refletir sobre sua aplicabilidade em diferentes campos de estudo, desde representações grotescas do corpo humano até a análise de nossas emoções em relação à natureza e aos animais não humanos.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Alexander, J. C. (2006). From the depths of despair: performance, counterperformance and ‘September 11’. En Alexander, J. C., Giesen, B. y Mast, J. L. (Eds.), Social Performance. Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics, and Ritual (pp. 91-114). Cambridge University Press.

Bouchard, G. y Taylor, C. (2008). Building the future: A time for reconciliation. Abridged Report. Gouvernement du Québec.

Bugallo, A. I. (2015). Filosofía ambiental y ecosofías. Arne Naess, Spinoza y James. Prometeo Libros.

Canetti, E. (1978 [1960]). Crowds and Power. Continuum.

Citton, Y. (2008). Entre l’économie psychique de Spinoza et l’inter-psychologie économique de Tarde. En Citton, Y. y Lordon, F. (Dirs.), Spinoza et les sciences sociales. De la puissance de la multitude à l’économie des affects (pp. 71-106). Éditions Amsterdam.

Citton, Y. (2017). The ecology of attention. Polity.

Crockett, M. J. (2017). Moral outrage in the digital age. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, 769-771 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0213-3.

Deluca, K. M. (2009). Greenpeace International Media Analyst Reflects on Communicating Climate Change. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 3(2), 263-269. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030902972734.

Durham, M. (1996). Preparing for armageddon: Citizen militias, the patriot movement and the Oklahoma city bombing. Terrorism and Political Violence, 8(1), 65-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546559608427333.

Eliade, M. (2013 [1957]). Le sacré et le profane. Gallimard.

Fisher, M. (2016). The Weird and The Eerie. Repeater Books.

Forrester, M. (2013). PETA making social noise: A perspective on shock advertising. Portuguese Journal of Social Science, 12(1), 85-100.

Freud, S. (1955 [1930]). El malestar en la cultura. Santiago Rueda.

Gilbert, A., Prévost, M. y Telier, G. (Coord). (2022). Libertés malmenées. Chronique d’une année trouble à l’Université d’Ottawa. Leméac.

Girard, R. (1983). Le Bouc émissaire. Grasset.

Girard, R. (2010 [1972]). La violence et le sacré. Fayard/Pluriel.

Girard, R. (2011). Sacrifice. Michigan State University Press.

Girard, R., Oughourlian, J. M. y Lefort, G. (1978). Des choses cachées depuis la fondation du monde. Grasset.

Goldhaber, M. H. (1997). The Attention Economy and the Net. First Monday, 2(4). https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/download/519/440.

Hajer, M. A. (1997). The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford University Press.

Jensen, D. (2016). The Myth of Human Supremacy. Seven Stories Press.

Kaufmann, E. (2020). Liberal Fundamentalism: A Sociology of Wokeness. American Affairs, IV(4). https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2020/11/liberal-fundamentalism-a-sociology-of-wokeness/.

Labasse, B. (2020). La valeur des informations. Ressorts et contraintes du marché des idées. Les Presses de l'Université d'Ottawa

Lasch, C. (1991 [1979]). The Culture of Narcissism. American Life in an Age of Diminishing Expectations. Norton.

Lévy, P. (1995). Qu’est-ce que le virtuel? Éditions La Découverte.

May, S. (2019). The Power of Cute. Princeton University Press.

McLuhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg galaxy; the making of typographic man. University of Toronto Press.

Moench, D. B. (19 de octubre de 2020). The WASP Roots of the Social Justice Movement. Tablet. https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/wasp-roots-social-justice.

Moles, A. (1977 [1971]). Psychologie du kitsch. L’art du bonheur. Denoël/Gonthier.

Ortega y Gasset, J. (2012 [1929]). La rebelión de las masas. Espasa Libros.

Rieff, P. (1966). The Triumph of the Therapeutic. Uses of Faith After Freud. Harper & Row.

Rose, P. (2010). René Girard as Media Ecologist. En Corey, A. (Ed.), Valuation and Media Ecology: Ethics, Morals, and Laws (pp. 91-123). Hampton Press.

Sacasas, L. M. (27 de septiembre de 2011). Nathaniel Hawthorne Anticipates McLuhan and de Chardin. Technology, Culture, and Ethics. https://thefrailestthing.com/2011/09/27/nathaniel-hawthorne-anticipates-mcluhan-and-de-chardin/.

Tchakhotine, S. (1992). Le viol des foules par la propaganda politique. Gallimard.

Theilard de Chardin, P. (1983 [1963]). El fenómeno humano. Taurus.

Veroni, C. (2014). Spin. How Politics Has the Power to Turn Marketing On Its Head. Anansi.

Vizcaíno-Verdú, A. y Contreras-Pulido, P. (2024). Cross-platform hatedom: influencers’ strategies for managing affective aversión. Cuadernos Info, 60. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.60.85872.

O sagrado e a violência no ecossistema da comunicação digital

Resumo

Downloads

Referências