Commentary on the ruling of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the case of Artavia Murillo et al.
Keywords:
in vitro fecundation; legal personality recognition; equality before the law.Abstract
The present article is a critical analysis of the judgment of the Inter–American Court in the case known as in vitro fecundation. For the author, the Court’s ruling is impressive for its weak argumentation, its logical mistakes and its contradiction in light of the very same international corpus juris that the International Human Rights Court had elaborated (such as legal personality recognition and equality before the law). Moreover, there are procedural aspects in the ruling that also lack consistent argumentation.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2023-06-13
Issue
Section
Research Articles
License
This journal and its works are published under the Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0, which allows users to download, share, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format, provided that appropriate credit is given and a link to the license is included. It also permits users to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided that any resulting work is distributed under the same license as the original. It does not authorize the use of the content for commercial purposes.
This license does not transfer moral rights, which remain with the author in accordance with copyright law.
How to Cite
Henríquez Herrera, I. (2023). Commentary on the ruling of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the case of Artavia Murillo et al. Revista Internacional De Derechos Humanos, 3, 53-75. https://ojs.austral.edu.ar/ridh/article/view/1137
_(1)_.png)
_(2).png){kind=logo}
