Provisional Patent in Argentina

Keywords: provisional patent, precautionary patent, priority, disclosure, grace period, national treatment, protection period, protection in expectation, TRIPS, Paris Convention

Abstract

The provisional patent is a figure present in some national patent laws. Its application allows you to establish a priority over the invention it houses, starting a limited period within which the inventor can apply for a non-provisional patent invoking that priority date. Thus, this instrument is appropriate to protect inventions that have not fully completed their R&D stage, since it extends the term to determine the effective value of the invention, while early establishing its priority before the state of the art. The management of this instrument is simpler and cheaper than that of an ordinary patent, increasing its attractiveness for inventors unfamiliar with the patent system and/or with limited budgets for managing their intellectual property.

The present work gives an account of the characteristics of this patent, of its observance of supranational letters in the matter and of the own forms that its presence adopts in the legislations of some countries. On the other hand, its levels of adoption by users and its impact on a subsequent ordinary patent application in terms of national and international priority management are analysed. Likewise, this work studies the forms of articulation that this institute can present with the prior disclosure and with the duration of the protection of the invention, both effective and in expectation.

Formerly present in Argentine legislation, the reasons for its elimination are reviewed and its reincorporation is postulated, with modifications, considering its usefulness for the protection of inventions of public R&D&i systems and local start-ups and SMEs, with little participation in the patent system. Likewise, the contribution that the presence of this institute would have on the architecture of patent law by providing a more balanced treatment to National Treatment is analysed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Castillo, L. y Domínguez, C. (2021). Patente provisional en Chile: procedimiento, ventajas e incentivos para innovar. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 16(3), 79-88.

Choudhary, J. (2019). Is it useful to file a Provisional Patent? What are the pros and cons? Blog IPLeaders. https://blog.ipleaders.in/provisional-patent-filing-pros-cons/.

Crouch, D. (2008). A First Look at Who Files Provisional Patent Applications. Patentlyo. https://patentlyo.com/patent/2008/06/a-first-look-at.html.

Crouch, D. (2010). Is novelty obsolete? Chronicling the irrelevance of the invention date in U.S. patent law. Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, 16(1). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1576564.

Crouch, D. (2011). Patent Stats: Abandoning Provisional Patent Applications. Patentlyo. https://patentlyo.com/patent/2011/12/patent-stats-abandoning-provisional-patent-applications.html.

Díaz, A. (2008). América Latina y el Caribe. La propiedad Intelectual después de los tratados de Libre Comercio. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe, Naciones Unidas.

Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines. (2019). An Act Providing for the Revised Intellectual Property Code of The Philippines and for Other Purposes. https://www.ipophil.gov.ph/news/invitation-to-submit-comments-an-act-providing-for-the-revised-intellectual-property-code-of-the-philippines-and-for-other-purposes/.

Jablon, C. (2010). How to patent inventions on a tight corporate budget. Information Display 10/10. https://sid.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/j.2637-496x.2010.tb00313.x.

Moreno Gómez, F. (2020). No, el derecho de prioridad no protege tu invención durante 1 año en todo el mundo. Información en materia de patentes. https://patentes.wordpress.com/2020/11/02/el-poder-del-derecho-de-prioridad-te-lo-ordena/.

Naranjo, L. (2017). Patente provisional en Portugal. Protectia. https://www.protectia.eu/2014/02/patente-provisional-en-portugal/.

Oficina Española de Patentes y Marcas. (2015). El período de gracia en los procedimientos de concesión de patentes. Patentes y Marcas. Blog sobre Propiedad Industrial. https://www.madrimasd.org/blogs/patentesymarcas/2015/el-periodo-de-gracia-en-los-procedimientos-de-concesion-de-patentes/.

Olea, R. (24 de enero de 2022). Proposed provisional patent application in the Philippines. Asia Business Law Journal. https://law.asia/provisional-patent-application-philippines/.

Organización Mundial de la Propiedad Intelectual. (1981). Situación de la Propiedad Industrial en los Países de América Latina. Oficina Internacional de la Organización Mundial de la Propiedad Intelectual.

Radack, D. (1995). GATT Brings Major Changes in U.S. Patent Law. Journal of the minerals, metals & materials society, 47(5), 79. https://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/matters/matters-9505.html.

Rey, A. (2021). Anteproyecto de Ley para la reforma de la Normativa de Propiedad Industrial. Cuatrecasas. https://www.cuatrecasas.com/es/latam/articulo/espana-anteproyecto-de-ley-para-la-reforma-de-la-normativa-de-p-i.

Rico, M. (2016). El periodo de gracia y la innovación en el sistema de patentes europeo. Oficina Española de Patentes y Marcas. https://www.madrimasd.org/blogs/patentes/2016/02/15/183/.

Rico, M. y Suárez, J. (2015). I+D+i – Un sistema ineficiente en una desinformada economía del conocimiento. Oficina Española de Patentes y Marcas. https://www.madrimasd.org/blogs/patentes/2015/12/15/166/.

Roffe, P. y Santa Cruz, M. (2006). Los derechos de propiedad intelectual en los acuerdos de libre comercio celebrados por países de América Latina con países desarrollados. Serie comercio internacional, CEPAL. https://www.cepal.org/sites/default/files/publication/files/4416/S2006610_es.pdf.

Slate, W. (2003). In Defence of the Misunderstood Provisional Application. Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society, 85, 219-227.

United States Patent and Trademark Office. (2021). Performance and Accountability Report. https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/USPTOFY21PAR.pdf.

United States Patent and Trademark Office. (s.f.). Provisional Application for Patent. Provisional Patent Application Forms. https://www.uspto.gov/patents/basics/types-patent-applications/provisional-application-patent.

World Intellectual Property Organization. (2022). Grace Period. Certain aspects of national/regional patent laws. https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/scp/en/national_laws/grace_period.pdf.

Zammit, M. (2021). Intellectual Property from Australia. The path to commercialisation: 10 things to consider after filing a provisional patent application. Mondaq. https://www.mondaq.com/australia/patent/1125882/the-path-to-commercialisation-10-things-to-consider-after-filing-a-provisional-patent-application.

Published
2022-12-29
How to Cite
Ardila, F. (2022). Provisional Patent in Argentina. Revista Iberoamericana De La Propiedad Intelectual, (17), 7-35. https://doi.org/10.26422/RIPI.2022.1700.ard
Section
Doctrine