The Internal Morality of International Law

  • Evan Fox-Decent McGill University
  • Evan J. Criddle William y Mary Law School
Keywords: public fiduciary law, international law, legal theory, jurisprudence, Lon Fuller

Abstract

In this essay we build on public fiduciary theory and Lon Fuller’s notion of the internal morality of law. We posit two criteria necessary to establish the internal morality of international law. We argue that the internal morality of international law is derived from the synthesis of a fiduciary criterion of legitimacy and the prohibition of unilateralism. The former refers to the idea that any public action which cannot be reasonably said to be made in the name of, or on behalf of, those subject to it is illegitimate. The latter refers to the prohibition of one state imposing its will on another. We argue that the fiduciary criterion and the prohibition of unilateralism are complementary, and their synthesis provides a compelling explanation of international law’s authority. This is evident from the character and legal effects of jus cogens or peremptory norms. Finally, we address numerous challenges that could be raised against this conception of international law, and its implications for the rule of law in the international realm.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Evan Fox-Decent, McGill University

Juris Doctor por la Universidad de Toronto, Master of Arts por la University of Manitoba y Ph.D. en Filosofía por la University of Toronto. Es profesor titular en la Facultad de Derecho de la McGill University. Es miembro del Board de la Canadian Philosophical Association.

Evan J. Criddle, William y Mary Law School

Juris Doctor por la Facultad de Derecho de Yale, donde se desempeñó como editor de ensayos del Yale Law Journal y editor de artículos del Yale Journal of International Law. Es profesor Ernest W. Goodrich y profesor de investigación Reveley en la Facultad de Derecho William & Mary. Sus intereses de investigación se centran en el derecho internacional público, la teoría jurídica internacional, el derecho de asilo y refugiados, los derechos humanos, el derecho administrativo y el derecho fiduciario. Es autor o editor de cuatro libros: Fiduciarios de la humanidad: cómo el derecho internacional constituye la autoridad (Oxford University Press, con Evan Fox-Decent), Derechos humanos en emergencias (Cambridge University Press), Gobierno fiduciario (Cambridge University Press) y el Manual de Oxford de Derecho Fiduciario (Oxford University Press, con Robert H. Sitkoff y Paul B. Miller). Su investigación ha recibido el generoso apoyo del Social Science and Humanities Research Council y ha sido citada por los tribunales supremos de Canadá y Estados Unidos. Trabajó para el Honorable J. Clifford Wallace de la Corte de Apelaciones del Noveno Circuito de los Estados Unidos y fue profesor en la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de Syracuse.

References

Bodin, J. (1986). Les six livres de la République (Ed. C. Frémont, M. D. Couzinet y H. Rochais). Fayard.

Brunnée, J. y Toope, S. J. (2010a). Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account. Cambridge University Press.

Brunnée, J. y Toope, S. J. (2010b). The Responsibility to Protect and the Use of Force: Building Legality? Global Responsibility to Protect, 2(3), 191.

Criddle, E. J. (2017). Liberty in Loyalty: A Republican Theory of Fiduciary Law. Texas Law Review, 95(5), 993-1060.

Criddle, E. J. y Fox-Decent, E. (2016a). Fiduciaries of Humanity: How International Law Constitutes Authority. Oxford University Press.

Criddle, E. J. y Fox-Decent, E. (2016b). Keeping the Promise of Public Fiduciary Theory: A Reply to Leib and Galoob. Yale Law Journal Forum, 126, 192-215.

Criddle, E. J. y Fox-Decent, E. (2018). Guardians of Legal Order: The Dual Commissions of Public Fiduciaries. En Criddle, E. J., Fox-Decent, E., Gold. A. S., Kim. S. H. y Miller, P. B. (Eds.), Fiduciary Government (pp. 67-95). Cambridge University Press.

Criddle, E. J. y Fox-Decent, E. (2019). Mandatory Multilateralism. American Journal of International Law, 113(2), 272-325.

Davis, S. (2018). The Private Law State. McGill Law Journal, 63(3&4), 727-763.

Fox-Decent, E. (2020). Jurisprudential Reflections on Cosmopolitan Law. En Bomhoff, J., Dyzenhaus, D. y Poole, T. (Eds.), The Double-Facing Constitution (pp. 121-152). Cambridge University Press.

Fuller, L. L. (1969). The Morality of Law. Yale University Press.

Keitner, C. L. (2018). Explaining International Acts. McGill Law Journal, 63(3&4), 649-675.

Koskenniemi, M. (2007). Constitutionalism as Mindset: Reflection on Kantian Themes About International Law and Globalization. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 8(1), 9-36.

Lauterpacht, H. (1927). Private Law Sources and Analogies of International Law (with Special Reference to International Arbitration). Longmans, Green & Co.

Leib, E. J. y Galoob, S. R. (2016). Fiduciary Political Theory: A Critique. Yale Law Journal, 125(7), 1820-2181.

Moyn, S. (2018). Not Enough: Human Rights in an Unequal World. Harvard University Press.

Ohlin, J. D. (2018). In Praise of Jus Cogens’ Conceptual Incoherence. McGill Law Journal, 63(3&4), 701-726.

Peters, A. (2009). Humanity as the A and Q of Sovereignty. European Journal of International Law, 20(3), 513-544.

Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.

Stacy, H. (2003). Relational Sovereignty. Stanford Law Review, 55(5), 2029-2059.

Trapp, K. N. y Robinson, E. (2018). Extra-Territorial “Fiduciary” Obligations and “Ensuring” Respect for International Humanitarian Law. McGill Law Journal, 63(3&4), 677-700.

Published
2022-06-13
How to Cite
Fox-Decent, E., & Criddle, E. J. (2022). The Internal Morality of International Law. Revista Jurídica Austral, 3(1), 259-279. https://doi.org/10.26422/RJA.2022.0301.fox
Section
Research Articles