The Internal Morality of International Law
Abstract
In this essay we build on public fiduciary theory and Lon Fuller’s notion of the internal morality of law. We posit two criteria necessary to establish the internal morality of international law. We argue that the internal morality of international law is derived from the synthesis of a fiduciary criterion of legitimacy and the prohibition of unilateralism. The former refers to the idea that any public action which cannot be reasonably said to be made in the name of, or on behalf of, those subject to it is illegitimate. The latter refers to the prohibition of one state imposing its will on another. We argue that the fiduciary criterion and the prohibition of unilateralism are complementary, and their synthesis provides a compelling explanation of international law’s authority. This is evident from the character and legal effects of jus cogens or peremptory norms. Finally, we address numerous challenges that could be raised against this conception of international law, and its implications for the rule of law in the international realm.
Downloads
References
Bodin, J. (1986). Les six livres de la République (Ed. C. Frémont, M. D. Couzinet y H. Rochais). Fayard.
Brunnée, J. y Toope, S. J. (2010a). Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account. Cambridge University Press.
Brunnée, J. y Toope, S. J. (2010b). The Responsibility to Protect and the Use of Force: Building Legality? Global Responsibility to Protect, 2(3), 191.
Criddle, E. J. (2017). Liberty in Loyalty: A Republican Theory of Fiduciary Law. Texas Law Review, 95(5), 993-1060.
Criddle, E. J. y Fox-Decent, E. (2016a). Fiduciaries of Humanity: How International Law Constitutes Authority. Oxford University Press.
Criddle, E. J. y Fox-Decent, E. (2016b). Keeping the Promise of Public Fiduciary Theory: A Reply to Leib and Galoob. Yale Law Journal Forum, 126, 192-215.
Criddle, E. J. y Fox-Decent, E. (2018). Guardians of Legal Order: The Dual Commissions of Public Fiduciaries. En Criddle, E. J., Fox-Decent, E., Gold. A. S., Kim. S. H. y Miller, P. B. (Eds.), Fiduciary Government (pp. 67-95). Cambridge University Press.
Criddle, E. J. y Fox-Decent, E. (2019). Mandatory Multilateralism. American Journal of International Law, 113(2), 272-325.
Davis, S. (2018). The Private Law State. McGill Law Journal, 63(3&4), 727-763.
Fox-Decent, E. (2020). Jurisprudential Reflections on Cosmopolitan Law. En Bomhoff, J., Dyzenhaus, D. y Poole, T. (Eds.), The Double-Facing Constitution (pp. 121-152). Cambridge University Press.
Fuller, L. L. (1969). The Morality of Law. Yale University Press.
Keitner, C. L. (2018). Explaining International Acts. McGill Law Journal, 63(3&4), 649-675.
Koskenniemi, M. (2007). Constitutionalism as Mindset: Reflection on Kantian Themes About International Law and Globalization. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 8(1), 9-36.
Lauterpacht, H. (1927). Private Law Sources and Analogies of International Law (with Special Reference to International Arbitration). Longmans, Green & Co.
Leib, E. J. y Galoob, S. R. (2016). Fiduciary Political Theory: A Critique. Yale Law Journal, 125(7), 1820-2181.
Moyn, S. (2018). Not Enough: Human Rights in an Unequal World. Harvard University Press.
Ohlin, J. D. (2018). In Praise of Jus Cogens’ Conceptual Incoherence. McGill Law Journal, 63(3&4), 701-726.
Peters, A. (2009). Humanity as the A and Q of Sovereignty. European Journal of International Law, 20(3), 513-544.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
Stacy, H. (2003). Relational Sovereignty. Stanford Law Review, 55(5), 2029-2059.
Trapp, K. N. y Robinson, E. (2018). Extra-Territorial “Fiduciary” Obligations and “Ensuring” Respect for International Humanitarian Law. McGill Law Journal, 63(3&4), 677-700.
Copyright (c) 2022 Evan Fox-Decent, Evan J. Criddle
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This license allows the copy, distribution, exhibition and representation of the work provided authorship is acknowledged and the work is properly quoted. Commercial use of the original work or the generation of derived works are not allowed.
The authors hereby guarantee the right to the first publication of the work to the Revista Jurídica Austral.