The Inter-American Court of Human Rights and Conventionality Control
Dialogue or Dominance?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26422/ridh.2024.1401.carKeywords:
Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Conventionality Control, Transnational Judicial Dialogue, Domestic JudiciariesAbstract
During the past seventeen years, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR), based in San José, Costa Rica, has taken substantial steps to ensure compliance with its decisions. It devised a brand-new tool, known as ‘conventionality control’ (CC), which bears some resemblance to the judicial review paradigm sketched out by the U.S. Supreme Court in the famous Marbury v. Madison decision (1803). It also has more immediate historical connections with ‘control of community law’ exercised by the European Court of Justice (ECJ). CC basically compels national judges to uphold both San José de Costa Rica Treaty provisions and Inter-American Court of Human Rights case law. This Court has stressed in the past the need for effective national compliance of its rulings. Now domestic judges are not only bound by their national constitutional and legislative framework, but also by the Treaty and its supra-national interpretation. Tensions mount as Supreme and/or Constitutional Courts are no longer in fact final, at least as far as human rights are concerned. Sovereignty is blurred and constitutional supremacy is jeopardized. Conventionality control discourse is linked to the Latin American cultural and political traditions of ineffective judicial oversight and lack of full enforcement of judicial decisions. However, despite its will, the IACtHR will have to bolster its own political and even administrative performance, if it wants to effectively impose this new standard on national judicial bureaucracies.
Downloads
References
Abel, Federico (2011), ‘El control de convencionalidad como mecanismo para la integración entre el Derecho interno y el Derecho interamericano’, La Ley, May 20.
Aguilar Cavallo, Gonzalo (2010), ‘La Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos y los derechos sociales’, in Revista Iberoamericana de Derecho Procesal Constitucional, no 13.
Antkowiak, Thomas M.and Gonza, Alejandra (2017), The American Convention on Human Rights (Essential Rights), Oxford University Press.
Ayala, Carlos (2016), ‘The judicial dialogue between international and natiponal courts in the Inter-American human rights system’, in Schenin, Martin ; Krunke, Helle and Aksenova, Marina (Eds.), Judges as Guardians of Constitutionalismn and Human Rights, Elgar Publishing.
Balkin, Jack M., (2011), Constitutional Redemption (Political Faith in an Unjust World), Harvard University Press.
Becerra Ramírez, Manuel (2006), ‘Comentarios sobre la sentencia de la Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación en el caso de Los Halcones’, in Cuestiones Constitucionales (Revista Mexicana de Derecho Constitucional), no. 14.
Baum, Lawrence (2006), Judges and Their Audiences (A Perspective on Judicial Behavior), Princeton University Press.
Bianchi, Alberto (2010), ‘Una reflexión sobre el llamado ‘control de convencionalidad’’, in La Ley, vol. E.
Bickel, Alexander M. (1962), The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics, Bobbs-Merrill.
Brewer-Carias, Allan R. (2009), ‘La interrelación entre los Tribunales Constitucionales en América Latina y la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos y la cuestión de la inejecutibilidad de sus decisiones en Venezuela’, in Anuario Iberoamericano de Justicia Constitucional, no.13.
Brewer-Carias, Allan R. (2011), Constitutional Courts as Positive Legislators, Cambridge University Press.
Buergenthal, Thomas (2005), ‘New Upload: Remembering the Early Years of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’, 37:l NYU Journal of International Law and Politics.
Cappeletti, Mauro (1981), ‘Nécessité et légitimité de la justice constitutionnelle’, in Revue Internationale de Droit Comparé, no. 2.
Caputi, Claudia, and Salvatelli, Ana (2010), ‘Manifestaciones de la globalización en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Suprema sobre el Derecho Administrativo’, in La Ley, Suplemento Extraordinario Administrativo 75 Aniversario.
Carbonell, Miguel (2007), ‘El neoconstitucionalismo en su laberinto’, in Carbonell, Miguel (Ed.), Teoría del Neoconstitucionalismo (Ensayos escogidos), Trotta.
Carraud, Michel (2005), ‘Les mutations constitutionnelles récents dans les États andins’, in Bernard, Marie-Julie, and Carraud, Michael (Directors), Justice et Démocratie en Amérique Latine, Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
Cassese, Antonio (2003), International Criminal Law, Oxford University Press.
Contesse, Jorge (2017), “The Final Word? Constitutional Dialogue and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights”, in International Journal Of Constitutional Law, vol. 15, 414-435.
Cossío Díaz, José Ramón (2009), ‘Constitutional Justice in Iberoamerica: Social Influence and Human Rights’, in 2 (1) Mexican Law Review.
Daly, Tom Gerald (2017), ‘Brazilian ‘Supremocracy’ and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Unpicking an Unclear Relationship’, in Pedro Fortes, Boratti, Larissa, Andrés Palacios Lleras et al., Law and Policy in Latin America (Transforming Courts, Institutions, and Rights), Palgrave MacMillan.
De Paz González, Isaac (2018), The Social Rights Jurisprudence in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Elgar.
De Vergottini, Guiseppe (2010), Más allá del diálogo entre tribunales (Comparación y relación entre jurisdicciones), Civitas Thomson Reuters.
Elias, José Sebastián (2011), ‘Justicia transicional y justicia internacional (A propósito del caso ‘Gomes Lund’)’, in Revista De Derecho Comparado, vol. 19.
Epp, Charles R. (1998), The Rights Revolution, The University of Chicago Press.
Fassbender, Bardo (2007), ‘We the Peoples of the U.N.: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form in International Law’, in Loughlin, Martin and Neil Walker, The Paradox of Constitutionalism (Constituent Power and Constitutional Form), Oxford University Press.
Fernández Segado, Francisco (2009), La justicia constitucional: una visión de Derecho Comparado, vol. I, Dykinson.
Ferrer Mac-Gregor, Eduardo (2010), ‘El control difuso de convencionalidad en el Estado constitucional’, in Fix-Zamudio, Héctor, and Valadés, Diego, Formación y perspectivas del Estado en México, UNAM and El Colegio Nacional.
Ferrer Mac-Gregor, Eduardo (2017), “The CC as a Core Mechanism of the Ius Constitutionale Commune”, in von Bogdandy, Armin, Ferrer Mac-Gregor, Eduardo, Morales Antoniazzi, Mariela et al. (Editors), Transformative Constitutionalism in Latin America (The Emergence of a New Ius Commune), Oxford.
Fix Zamudio, Héctor (2002), ‘Eficacia de los instrumentos protectores de los derechos humanos’, in Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional, no. 2.
Fix-Zamudio, Héctor and Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor (2009), Las sentencias de los tribunales constitucionales, UNAM, IMDPC and Porrúa.
García Ramírez, Sergio (2003), ‘El futuro del Sistema Interamericano de Protección de los Derechos Humanos’, in Ferrer Mac-Gregor, Eduardo (Coordinator), Derecho Procesal Constitucional, vol. 2, Porrúa.
García Ramírez, Sergio (2011), ‘Diálogo con Sergio García Ramírez. Derecho Internacional y Derechos Humanos’, in La Ley Actualidad, October 27th.
Goldstone, Lawrence (2008), The Activist (John Marshall, Marbury v. Madison and the Myth of Judicial Review), Walker Publishing.
Griffith, J.A.G. (1997), The Politics of the Judiciary, Fontana Press.
Hampton, Francoise; Martin, Claudia and Viljoen, Frans (2018), ‘Inaccessible apexes: Comparing access to human rights courts and commissions in Europe, the Americas and Asia’, in International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 16, no. 1.
Helmke, Gretchen (2005), Courts Under Constraints (Judges, Generals and Presidents in Argentina), Cambridge University Press.
Hennebel, Ludovic (2009), ‘La Cour Interamericaine des Droits de l´Homme : Entre Particularisme et Universalisme’, in Hennebel, Ludovic and Hélene Tigroudja, ‘Le Particularisme Interaméricain des Droits de l´Homme’, A. Pedone.
Hirschl, Ran (2004), Towards Juristocracy (The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism), Harvard University Press.
Hitters, Juan Carlos (2008), ‘¿Son vinculantes los pronunciamientos de la Comisión y de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos? (Control de constitucionalidad y convencionalidad)’, in Revista Iberoamericana de Derecho Procesal Constitucional, no. 10.
Hitters, Juan Carlos (2010), ‘Control de constitucionalidad y control de convencionalidad. Comparación’, in Revista Fac. Direito Sal De Minas, vol. 26, no. 1.
Huneeus, Alexandra (2010), ‘Rejecting the Inter-American Court: Judicialization, National Courts, and Regional Human Rights’, in Couso, Javier A.; Huneeus, Alexandra and Sieder, Rachel (Editors), Cultures of Legality: Judicialization and Political Activism in Latin America, Cambridge University Press.
Ip, Eric C. (2010), ‘Globalization and the future of the law of the sovereign state’, in International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 8, no. 3.
Kline, Harvey F. and Wade, Christine J. (2018), ‘The Latin American Tradition and Process of Development’, in Kline, Harvey F.; Wade, Christine J. and Wiarda, Howard J. (Editors), Latin American Politics and Development, Westview Press.
Klug, Heinz (2006), ‘South Africa: From Constitutional Promise to Social Transformation’, in Goldsworthy, Jeffrey (Ed.), Interpreting Constitutions (A Comparative Study), Oxford University Press.
Knight, Lee, and Epstein, Jack (1998), The Choices Justices Make, Congressional Quarterly.
Landa Arroyo, César (2005), ‘El Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos: Balance y Perspectiva’, in Landa Arroyo, César (Comp.), Jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos, Palestra.
López Latorre, Andrés and Ibárzabal, Milagros (2018), ‘Sexta Etapa (2013-2018): La Corte de la Igualdad’, in Santiago, Alfonso, and Bellocchio, Lucia (Dirs.), Historia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (1978-2018), Thomson Reuters La Ley.
Lorenzetti, Ricardo (2010), ‘Global Governance: Dialogue between Courts’, Robert Schuman Center for Advanced Studies, European University Institute, RSCAS Policy Paper no. 3.
Madrid, Raúl (2010), The Origins of the Two Lefts in Latin America, in Political Science Quarterly, vol. 125, no. 4.
Mathen, Carissima (2019), Courts Without Cases (The Law and Politics of Advisory Opinions, Hart Publishing.
Mazzuoli, Valerio De Oliveira (2013), ‘Preambulo. Comentario’, in Mazzuoli, Valerio De Oliveira and Gomes, Luis Flavio, Comentários a Convencao Americana do Direitos Humanos (Pacto de San José de Costa Rica), Thomson Reuters Revista Dos Tribunais.
Mazzuoli, Valerio De Oliveira (2015), Curso de Direitos Humanos, Editora Método.
Mohor Abuauad, Salvador (2001), ‘La jerarquía normativa de los tratados internacionales’, in Navarro Beltrán, Enrique (Ed.), Veinte Años de la Constitución Chilena 1981-2001, LexisNexis.
Moroni Romero, Lucas (2011), ‘¿Corresponde hablar de control de convencionalidad en el ordenamiento jurídico argentino?’, Jurisprudencia Argentina, August 31.
Nogueira Alcalá, Humberto (2007), ‘Los desafíos de la sentencia de la Corte Interamericana en el caso Almonacid Arellano’, in 2 Revista de Derecho.
Paris, Marie-Luce (2016), ‘Setting the Scene: Elements of constitutional theory and methodology of the research’, in Bell, John and Paris, Marie-Luce (Editors), Rights-Based Constitutional Review (Constitutional Courts in a Changing Landscape), Elgar Publishing.
Pasqualucci, Jo M. (2003), The Practice and Procedure of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Cambridge University Press.
Paul Díaz, Alvaro (2019), “Los enfoques acotados del control de convencionalidad”, in 87 (246) Revista de Derecho de la Universidad de Concepcion, July-December, 49-82.
Parassram Concepción, Natasha (2001), “The Legal Implications of Trinidad and Tobago´s withdrawal from the American Convention of Human Rights”, in American University International Law Review, vol. 16, no. 3.
Quiche Ramírez, Manuel Fernando (2009), ‘El control de convencionalidad y el sistema colombiano’, in 12 Revista Iberoamericana de Derecho Procesal Constitucional.
Ramelli Arteaga, Alejandro (2019), Diálogos entre la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos y los jueces constitucionales latinoamericanos, Tirant Lo Blanch.
Rey Cantor, Ernesto (2008), Control de Convencionalidad de las Leyes y Derechos Humanos, Porrúa.
Rohr, John A. (1995), Founding Republics in France and America: A Study in Constitutional Governance, University Press of Kansas.
Reynolds, Noel B., (1987), ‘Constitutionalism and the Rule of Law’, in Bryner, Gary C., and Reynolds, Noel B., Constitutionalism and Rights, Brigham Young University.
Roht Arriaza, Naomi, and Bernabeu, Almudena (2009), ‘Justicia trasnacional como proceso híbrido’, in Almqvist, Jessica, and Espósito, Carlos, ‘Justicia Transicional en Iberoamérica’, Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales.
Sagüés, Néstor Pedro (2010), ‘Dificultades operativas del control de convencionalidad en el sistema interamericano’, in La Ley, vol. D.
Sagüés, Néstor Pedro (2016), ‘De la Constitución Nacional a la Constitución ‘convencionalizada’’, in Ferrer Mac-Gregor (Coord.), Derecho Procesal Constitucional Transnacional, Porrúa.
Sagüés, Néstor Pedro (2017), La interpretación judicial de la Constitución (De la Constitución nacional a la Constitución convencionalizada, Porrúa.
Salado Osuna, Ana (2004), Los Casos Peruanos ante la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos, Normas Legales.
Santiago, Alfonso (2010), En las fronteras entre el Derecho Constitucional y la Filosofía del Derecho (Consideraciones iusfilosóficas acerca de algunos temas constitucionales), Marcial Pons.
Scribner, Druscilla (2011), ‘Courts, Power, and Rights in Argentina and Chile’, in Helmke, Gretchen and Ríos-Figueroa, Julio, Courts in Latin America, Cambridge University Press.
Scribner, Druscilla (2011), ‘Strategic Litigation in the Inter-American Court’, Paper presented to the Interim Meeting of the IPSA Research Committee on Comparative Judicial Studies, Irvine, California.
Seminara, Letizia (2009), Les effects des arréts de la Cour interaméricaine des droits de l´homme, Bruylant.
Sieghart, Paul (1997), The International Law of Human Rights, Oxford University Press.
Sikkink, Kathryn (2009), ‘The Transnational Dimension of the Judicialization of Politics in Latin America’, in Sieder, Rachel; Schjolden, Line, and Angell, Alan, The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America, Palgrave Macmillan.
Smulotivitz, Carolina (2009), ‘Petitioning and Creating Rights: Judicialization in Argentina”, in Sieder, Rachel; Schjolden, Line, and Angell, Alan, The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America, Palgrave Macmillan.
Stack, John F. Jr. (2005), ‘Constructing Human Rights in the Americas: Institutional Development and Practice in the New World’, in Volcansek, Mary L. and John F. Stack, Jr., Courts Crossing Borders (Blurring the Lines of Sovereignty), Carolina Academic Press.
Staton, Jeffrey K. and Romero, Alexia, (2011), and Romero, Alexia, ‘Clarity and Compliance in the Inter-American Human Rights System’, Paper presented at the Interim Meeting of IPSA Research Committee on Comparative Judicial Studies, Irvine, California.
Toledo, Pablo R. (2022), ‘Introducción al Control de Convencionalidad: Dimensiones y alcances”, in Toledo, Pablo R. (Dir.), Control de Convencionalidad, Ad-Hoc.
Tolley, Michael C. (2010), ‘Fundamental Rights, the European Court of Justice, and European Integration’, in Jackson, Donald W., Tolley, Michael C., and Volcansek, Mary L., (Editors), Globalizing Justice (Critical Perspectives on Trasnational Law and the Cross-Border Migration of Legal Norms), SUNY.
Trebucq, Silvia (2011), ‘El control de convencionalidad: Su ejercicio por parte de los tribunales nacionales’, La Ley, April 29.
Tribe, Laurence H. (2008), The Invisible Constitution, Oxford University Press.
Vallinder, Torbjörn (1995), ‘When the Courts Go Marching In’, in Tate, C. Neal, and Vallinder, Torbjörn, The Global Expansion of Judicial Power, New York University Press.
Ventura Robles, Manuel E. (2017), Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (Memorias), Porrúa.
Vivanco, José Miguel (1994), ‘International Human Rights Litigation in Latin America: The OAS Human Rights System’, in Kaysen, Carl; Pastor, Robert A., and Reed, Laura W. (Editors), Collective Responses to Regional Problems: The Case of Latin America and the Caribbean, American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
Whittington, Keith (2007), Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy, Princeton University Press.
Young, Katharine G. (2010), ‘A Typology of Economic and Social Rights Adjudication: Exploring the Catalytic Function of Judicial Review’, in International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 8, no. 3.
Zaffaroni, Eugenio Raúl (1994), Estructuras Judiciales, Ediar.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Internacional de Derechos Humanos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal and its works are published under the Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0, which allows users to download, share, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format, provided that appropriate credit is given and a link to the license is included. It also permits users to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided that any resulting work is distributed under the same license as the original. It does not authorize the use of the content for commercial purposes.
This license does not transfer moral rights, which remain with the author in accordance with copyright law.
_(1)_.png)
_(2).png){kind=logo}
