Singin’ in the RAM: Neighboring Rights in the Era of Hybrid Artists and Synthetic Producers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26422/RIPI.2026.espIA.jimKeywords:
generative artificial intelligence, related rights, hybrid artist, synthetic producer, digital clones, text and data mining, eative sovereignty and biometric identityAbstract
This article analyzes the disruptive impact of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) on the rights of performers and producers within the phonographic and audiovisual sectors. Using the transition from silent to sound film as a metaphor, the text explores how current technology is shifting the creative process toward systems capable of emulating human voice, image, and performance in an almost indistinguishable manner.
The study is structured around two main pillars. First, it addresses the figure of the “hybrid artist,” examining conflicts arising from the unauthorized use of images and voices for training AI models (input phase) and the creation of digital clones or deepfakes. It debates whether these processes constitute an infringement of the performer's right of reproduction or if they can be covered by exceptions such as text and data mining (TDM) under the European legal framework. Likewise, it highlights the growing importance of personal data protection and personality rights against the commodification of biometric identity.
Secondly, the article analyzes the emergence of the “synthetic producer,” questioning traditional concepts linked to the figures of phonogram and audiovisual recording producers. The article concludes with a reflection on recent European Union proposals, emphasizing the need to guarantee “creative sovereignty” that protects cultural diversity against purely extractive business models.
Downloads
References
Agencia Española de Protección de Datos. (14 de enero de 2026). Transcripción de voz con IA: implicaciones para la protección de datos. https://www.aepd.es/prensa-y-comunicacion/blog/transcripcion-de-voz-con-ai
Artist Rights Alliance. (1 de abril de 2024). 200+ Artists Urge Tech Platforms: Stop Devaluing Music. Medium. https://artistrightsnow.medium.com/200-artists-urge-tech-platforms-stop-devaluing-music-559fb109bbac
Bercovitz Rodríguez-Cano, R. (2017). Artículos 114-119. En Bercovitz Rodríguez-Cano, R. (Coord.), Comentarios a la ley de propiedad intelectual (pp. 1679-1718). Tirant lo Blanch.
Bontcheva, K., Pedreschi, D., Riess, S., Bechmann, A., De Gregorio, G. y Botan, M. (2025). First Draft Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-Generated Content. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/first-draft-code-practice-transparency-ai-generated-content
Bulayenko, O., Quintais, J. P., Gervais, D. J. y Poort, J. (2022). AI Music Outputs: Challenges to the Copyright Legal Framework. ReCreating Europe. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4072806
Cámara Águila, P. (2017). Artículo 113. En Bercovitz Rodríguez-Cano, R. (Coord.), Comentarios a la ley de propiedad intelectual (pp. 1661-1675). Tirant lo Blanch.
Carbajo Cascón, F. (2025). Inteligencia artificial generativa y derechos de propiedad intelectual. Problemas y posibles soluciones en la fase de entrenamiento y aprendizaje. En Guerrero Lebrón, M. J. y Alvarado, L. (Dirs.), Cuestiones actuales de Derecho mercantil digital (pp. 27-75). Colex.
Carbajo Cascón, F. (2026). Sobre la aplicación de los límites de minería de textos y datos al proceso de entrenamiento de modelos de inteligencia artificial generativa de uso general. En López Ortega, R. y Pachecho Cañete, M. (Dirs.), Nuevos horizontes del Derecho mercantil en un entorno tecnológico (pp. 15-52). Atelier.
Chat GPT Is Eating the World. (25 de febrero de 2026). Latest World Map of Copyright Suits v. AI cos. Total = 112 (Feb 25, 2026). https://chatgptiseatingtheworld.com/2026/02/25/latest-world-map-of-copyright-suits-v-ai-cos-total-112-feb-25-2026
Chia, O. y Tewari, S. (19 de febrero de 2026). The Chinese AI app sending Hollywood into a panic. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckg1dl410q9o
Davies, C. (23 de febrero de 2026). Hollywood studios escalate dispute over ByteDance’s ‘pervasive copyright infringement’ with its AI tools. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/business/story/2026-02-23/motion-pictures-association-raises-stakes-over-bytedances-illegal-ai
Ducato, R. y Strowel, A. (2021). Ensuring Text and Data Mining Remaining Issues with the EU Copyright Exceptions and Possible Ways Out, European Intellectual Property Review, (1/2021), 322-324.
EFE. (28 de enero de 2025). Cultura retira el real decreto de licencias para la IA y dialogará con el sector. https://efe.com/ciencia-y-tecnologia/2025-01-28/cultura-licencias-ia-inteligencia-artificial-decreto/
Erard, G. (21 de febrero de 2026). Seedance 2.0: la IA de ByteDance que crea vídeos realistas y enfurece a Hollywood. Hipertextual. https://hipertextual.com/inteligencia-artificial/seedance-2-0-ia-viral-tiktok-hollywood/
European Audiovisual Observatory. (2024). AI and the audiovisual sector: navigating the current legal landscape, IRIS. Council of Europe.
Ezrachi, A. y Stucke, M. E. (2022). How Big-Tech Barons Smash Innovation―and How to Strike Back: Market Experts on Tech Giants, Competition, and Democracy. Harper Business.
Ficsor, M. (2026). Guide to the Copyright and Related Rights Treaties Administered by WIPO (2ª ed.). WIPO.
García Vidal, A. (2020). Propiedad intelectual y minería de textos y datos. Estudios de los artículos 3 y 4 de la Directiva (UE) 2019/790. Actas de Derecho Industrial, 40, 99-124.
GenAIE. (2026). La IA en la reforma del Estatuto del Artista. https://genaie.es/ia-reforma-del-estatuto-del-artista/
González Gozalo, A. (2017). Artículos 120-125. En Bercovitz Rodríguez-Cano, R. (Coord.), Comentarios a la ley de propiedad intelectual (pp. 1721-1740). Tirant lo Blanch.
Grimes [@Grimezsz]. (23 de abril de 2023). I’ll split 50% royalties on any successful AI generated song that uses my voice. Same deal as I would with… [Tweet] X. https://x.com/Grimezsz/status/1650304051718791170
Hugenholtz, P. B. (2025). Deepfake Bills in Denmark and the Netherlands: Right idea, wrong legal framework. Kluwe Copyright Blog. https://legalblogs.wolterskluwer.com/copyright-blog/deepfake-bills-in-denmark-and-the-netherlands-right-idea-wrong-legal-framework/
Jiménez Serranía, V. (2020). Data, mining and innovation: qvo vadis, Europe? Analysis on the new exceptions for text and data mining. Cuadernos de derecho transnacional, 12(1), 247-258. https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2020.5188
Lucci, N. (2025). Generative AI and Copyright - Training, Creation, Regulation. Think Tank, European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/IUST_STU(2025)774095
Mourby, M., Cathaoir, K. O. y Bjerre Collin, C. (2021). Transparency of machine-learning in healthcare: The GDPR & European health law. Computer Law & Security Review, 43, 105611.
Murray (2025). Deceptive Exploitation: Deepfakes, the Rights of Publicity, and Trademark. IDEA Law Review. Franklin Pierce Law School, 65(2), 124-210.
Music Business Research. (27 de mayo de 2026). AI in the Music Industry – Part 17: ‘Fake Drake’ and the Problem of Deep Fakes. https://musicbusinessresearch.wordpress.com/2024/05/27/ai-in-the-music-industry-part-17-fake-drake-and-the-problem-of-deep-fakes/
Organización Mundial de la Propiedad Intelectual. (1961). Convención de Roma sobre la protección de los artistas intérpretes o ejecutantes, los productores de fonogramas y los organismos de radiodifusión. https://www.wipo.int/es/web/treaties/ip/rome/index
Organización Mundial de la Propiedad Intelectual. (1981). Guía de la Convención de Roma y del Convenio Fonogramas. https://doi.org/10.34667/TIND.35090
Organización Mundial de la Propiedad Intelectual. (1996). Tratado de la OMPI sobre Interpretación o Ejecución y Fonogramas. https://www.wipo.int/es/web/treaties/ip/wppt/index
Organización Mundial de la Propiedad Intelectual. (2026). Guía sobre los Tratados de Derecho de Autor y Derechos Conexos Administrados por la OMPI. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/es/copyright/891/wipo_pub_891.pdf
Real Academia Española. (s.f.). Sonido. Diccionario de la lengua española. https://dle.rae.es/sonido?m=form
Rosati, E. (2026). Is text and data mining synonymous with AI training? Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 19(12), 851-852. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpae092
Saiz García, C. (2022). El concepto de artista intérprete o ejecutante del artículo 105 TRLPI. Actas de Derecho Industrial, (42), 237-2629.
Saiz García, C. (2023). Is the Script of a Television Programme the Crux of Being a Legal Performer. GRUR International, 72(12), 1132-1142.
Sánchez Artisti, R. (2017). Artículos 105-110. En Bercovitz Rodríguez-Cano, R. (Coord.), Comentarios a la ley de propiedad intelectual (pp. 1533-1623). Tirant lo Blanch.
Singh Josan, H. (2024). AI and Deepfake Voice Cloning: Innovation, Copyright and Artists’ Rights. Digital Policy Hub Working Paper, Centre for International Governance Innovation.
Stober, S. y Dornis, T. W. (2026). Generative AI Training and Copyright Law. Transactions of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.15858
Trujillo Cabrera, C. (2024). El derecho a la propia imagen (y a la voz) frente a la inteligencia artificial. InDret, (1), 74-113.
Turing, A (1950). Computing Machinery and Intelligence, Mind, (49), (pp. 433-460).
Visser, D. J. G. (1 de octubre de 2024). Deepfakes under a neighbouring right. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5046493
Voss, A. (2026). Report on copyright and generative artificial intelligence- opportunities and challenges. Parlamento Europeo, A10-0019/2026. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-10-2026-0019_EN.html
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Vanessa Jiménez Serranía

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This license allows the copy, distribution, exhibition and representation of the work provided authorship is acknowledged and the work is properly quoted. Commercial use of the original work or the generation of derived works are not allowed.
The authors hereby guarantee the right to the first publication of the work to the Revista Iberoamericana de la Propiedad Intelectual.








































