Universality Through Subsidiarity? A Comparative Analysis of the Right to a Healthy Environment in the Jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26422/RIDH.2025.1502.mezKeywords:
right to a healthy environment, Inter-American Court of Human Rights, African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, subsidiarityAbstract
In the context of a global ecological crisis, there is an increasing tendency by actors to recast environmental concerns as legal issues within the framework of international human rights. This article addresses how differences in interpretation and enforcement of the right to a healthy or satisfactory environment, as reflected in the jurisprudence of the IACtHR and the ACmHPR, illustrate the universality of international human rights through the principle of subsidiarity. This article advances that subsidiarity is crucial in reconciling the universality of human rights, self-determination, and pluralism in the international system. It ultimately concludes that the analysis of the right to a healthy environment in the Inter-American and African systems demonstrates that the achievement of universality does not entail uniformity, but rather, subsidiarity ensures the recognition of contextual particularities across diverse systems, not only strengthening their legitimacy but also guaranteeing the genuine universality of human rights.
Downloads
References
Abioye, F. (2020). Advancing Human Rights Through Environmental Rule of Law in Africa. In Addaney, M. & Jegede, A. O. (Eds.), The Environment Under African Union Law (pp. 81-105). Palgrave Macmillan.
Alvez, A. P., & Becker Lorca, A. (2020). La consulta indígena en Chile: ¿Derecho de participación o de libre determinación? Estudios Sociales: Revista Universitaria Semestral, 59(2), 89-111.
Andargie, H. W. (2015). The Right to Environment Under African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights. International Journal of International Law, 2(1), 206-222.
An-Na’im, A. A. (1992). Human Rights in Cross-Cultural Perspectives: A Quest for Consensus. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Borges, A. (2019). The Solidification of the Right to a Healthy Environment before the Inter-American System of Human Rights (Master’s thesis). University of Vienna.
Brems, E. (2004). Reconciling Universality and Diversity in International Human Rights Law. In Nijhoff, B. (Eds.), Human Rights with Modesty: The Problem of Universalism (pp. 213-230). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Carozza, P. G. (2003). Subsidiarity as a Structural Principle of International Human Rights Law. American Journal of International Law, 97(1), 38-79.
Carstens, M. (2020). Lhaka Honhat Association v. Argentina: Landmark Decision on Direct Justiciability of Article 26 ACHR and the Autonomous Right to a Healthy Environment. Verfassung und Recht in Übersee/Law and Politics in Africa, Asia and Latin America, 53(4), 492-506.
Cerna, C. M. (1994). Universality of Human Rights and Cultural Diversity: Implementation of Human Rights in Different Socio-Cultural Contexts. Human Rights Quarterly, 16(4), 740-752.
Chenwi, L. (2018). The Right to a Satisfactory, Healthy and Sustainable Environment in the African Regional Human Rights System. In Knox, J. H. & Pejan, R. (Eds.), The Human Right to a Healthy Environment (pp. 59-85). Cambridge University Press.
Donnelly, J. (2007). The Relative Universality of Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 29(2), 281-306.
Dworkin, R (1997). Taking Rights Seriously. A&C Black.
Feria-Tinta, M., & Milnes, S. (2016). The Rise of Environmental Law in International Dispute Resolution: The Inter-American Court of Human Rights Issues a Landmark Advisory Opinion on the Environment and Human Rights. Yearbook of International Environmental Law, 27, 64-81.
Feria-Tinta, M., & Milnes, S. (2019). International Environmental Law for the 21st Century: The Constitutionalization of the Right to the Right to a Healthy Environment in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights Advisory Opinion 23. Colombian Yearbook of International Law, 12, 43-84.
Føllesdal, A. (2016). Subsidiarity and International Human Rights Courts: Respecting Self-Governance and Protecting Human Rights or Neither. Law and Contemporary Problems, 79(2), 147-164.
García Escobar, G. (2023). Human Rights Pluralistic Universality: A Bridge Between Global Norms and Cultural Diversity. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 41(2), 171-188.
Glendon, M. A. (2008). Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse. Simon and Schuster.
González Domínguez, P. (2017). Reconfiguración de la Relación entre el Derecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos y el Derecho Nacional sobre la base del Principio de Subsidiariedad. Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional, 17, 717-748.
Iglesias Vila, M. (2017). Subsidiariedad y Tribunales Internacionales de Derechos Humanos: ¿Deferencia hacia los Estados o División Cooperativa del Trabajo? Derecho PUCP, 79, 191-222.
Kaplan, S. (2017). Human Rights in Thick and Thin Societies: The Universal Declaration and Bridging the Gap (Doctoral dissertation). Utrecht University.
Lugard, S. B. (2022). The Human Right to a Satisfactory Environment and the Role of the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights. KAS African Law Study Library, 8(3), 402-413.
Lumina, M. (2020). The Right to a Clean, Safe and Healthy Environment Under the African Human Rights System. In Addaney, M. & Jegede, A. O. (Eds.), The Environment Under African Union Law (pp. 25-54). Palgrave Macmillan.
Mardikian, L. (2023). The Right to a Healthy Environment Before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 72(4), 945-975.
Mutua, M. (2007). Standard Setting in Human Rights: Critique and Prognosis. Human Rights Quarterly, 29(3), 547-630.
Omorovie, M. (2022). An Eco-Philosophical Discourse on the African Charter’s Right to a General Satisfactory Environment and Socio-Economic Development. Journal of African Studies and Sustainable Development, 3(1), 142-153.
Ojiaka, C. (2019). The West African Region and the Right to a Satisfactory Environment. University of The Gambia Law Review, 2, 173-184.
Orrego, G. (2015). Tools for Academic Research on Human Rights in Latin America: The Inter-American Human Rights System. Legal Information Management, 15(2), 108-115.
Polycarp, E. A. (2009). Enhancing Environmental Protection and Socio-Economic Development in Africa: A Fresh Look at the Right to a General Satisfactory Environment under the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights. Law, Environment and Development Journal, 5(1), 58-72.
Sajó, A. (2004). Human Rights with Modesty: The Problem of Universalism. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Sanzana Pavez, G. P. (2019). The Justiciability of the Human Right to a Healthy Environment in the African and Inter-American System (Master’s thesis). University of Oslo.
Savaresi, A. (2023). Environment and Human Rights. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Oxford University Press.
Schreuer, C. (1995). Regionalism vs. Universalism. European Journal of International Law, 6(3), 477-499.
Von Bogdandy, A., & Ureña, R. (2020). International Transformative Constitutionalism in Latin America. American Journal of International Law, 114(3), 403-442.
Zwart, T. (2012). Using Local Culture to Further the Implementation of International Human Rights: The Receptor Approach. Human Rights Quarterly, 34(2), 546-569.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Diego Zapata Meza
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal and its articles are published under the Creative Commons Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirDerivadasIgual 2.5 (Argentina) (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 AR) license, which allows the user to download, share, copy and redistribute the material in any format, provided the user can reliably prove his/her condition and provides a link to the license, and allows remixing, transforming and building upon the material, with the contribution being distributed under the same license as the original. Said license does not authorize the use of the contents for commercial purposes.
_(1)_.png)
_(2).png){kind=logo}
