Commentary on the ruling of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the case of Artavia Murillo et al.

Authors

  • Ian Henríquez Herrera

Keywords:

in vitro fecundation; legal personality recognition; equality before the law.

Abstract

The present article is a critical analysis of the judgment of the Inter–American Court in the case known as in vitro fecundation. For the author, the Court’s ruling is impressive for its weak argumentation, its logical mistakes and its contradiction in light of the very same international corpus juris that the International Human Rights Court had elaborated (such as legal personality recognition and equality before the law). Moreover, there are procedural aspects in the ruling that also lack consistent argumentation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-13

Issue

Vol. 3 (2013)

Section

Research Articles

License

This journal and its articles are published under the Creative Commons  Creative Commons  Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirDerivadasIgual 2.5 (Argentina) (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 AR) license, which allows the user to download, share, copy and redistribute the material in any format, provided the user can reliably prove his/her condition and provides a link to the license, and allows remixing, transforming and building upon the material, with the contribution being distributed under the same license as the original.  Said license does not authorize the use of the contents for commercial purposes.

How to Cite

Commentary on the ruling of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the case of Artavia Murillo et al. (2023). Revista Internacional De Derechos Humanos, 3, 53-75. https://ojs.austral.edu.ar/ridh/article/view/1137