Self-defense in the Current Edition of the Peruvian Criminal Code. The case of homicide in self-defense
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26422/RJA.2025.0602.silKeywords:
criminal law, self defense, foundation, homicideAbstract
In this paper the author decisively analyzes the practical implications of the recent legislative modifications of the institute of self-defense in the Peruvian Criminal Code. The focus is firmly placed on the classic interpretative issue of homicide in self-defense, approached from the perspective of material legitimacy. At the legislative level, the paper systematically interprets the current legal text that modifies the self-defense provision. The jurisprudential level includes a thorough examination of relevant doctrinal discussions. Lastly, the dogmatic level provides a robust overview of the traditional debates surrounding self-defense within legal philosophy, especially as it relates to practical philosophy and German criminal law. This comprehensive approach facilitates a deeper understanding of the issue and confidently proposes a solution. The paper presents a strong axiological and material reconstruction of self-defense grounded in its current legal framework. In conclusion, it asserts objective and subjective material criteria to rationalize the judicial application of self-defense, effectively addressing the interpretative challenge surrounding the material justification for homicide committed in self-defense.
Downloads
References
Binding, K. (1991 [1885]). Handbuch des Strafrechts (Vol. I). Scientia Verlag Aalen.
Feuerbach. P. (2007 [1847]). Lehrbuch des gemeinen in Deutschland geltenden peinlichen Rechts (Trad. E. Zaffaroni e I. Hagemeier). Hammurabi.
García, P. (2019). Derecho Penal. Parte General (3a ed.). Ideas.
Hobbes, T. (1940 [1651]). Leviatán, o la materia, forma y poder de una república eclesiástica y civil (Trad. M. Sánchez Sarto). Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Jakobs, G. (1991). Allgemeiner Teil (2a ed.). Walter de Gruyter.
Jescheck, H. y Weigend, T. (1996). Lehrbuch des Strafrechts. Allgemeiner Teil (5a ed.). Duncker & Humblot.
Kindhäuser, U. (2015). Acerca de la génesis de la fórmula. “El Derecho no necesita ceder ante el injusto” (Trad. J. Mañalich Raffo). En Mañalich Raffo, J. (Coord.), La antijuridicidad en el Derecho penal. Estudios sobre las normas permisivas y la legítima defensa (pp. 65-98). BdeF.
Mañalich Raffo, J. (2015). Normas permisivas y normas de tolerancia. En La antijuridicidad en el Derecho penal. Estudios sobre las normas permisivas y la legítima defensa (pp. 177-283). BdeF.
Mir Puig, S. (2003). Introducción a las bases del derecho penal (2ª ed.). BdeF.
Mir Puig, S. (2007). Derecho penal. Parte general (7ª ed.). Repertor.
Nino, C. (1980). Los límites de la responsabilidad penal. Una teoría liberal del delito (Trad. G. Rafael Navarro). Astrea.
Pawlik, M. (2002). Die Notwehr nach Kant und Hegel. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, 114, 259-299.
Pawlik, M. (2012). Das Unrecht des Bürgers. Grundlinien der Allgemeinen Verbrechenslehre. Mohr Siebeck.
Renzikowski, J. (1994). Notstand und Notwehr. Duncker & Humblot.
Roxin, C. y Greco, L. (2020). Allgemeiner Teil (5a ed.). C. H. Beck Verlag.
Sánchez-Ostiz, P. (2012). Fundamentos de política criminal. Un retorno a los principios. Marcial Pons.
Seelmann, K. (1978). Das Verhältnis von § 34 zu anderen Rechtfertigungsgründen. R.V. Decker’s Verlag.
Seelmann, K. (2013). Ideengeschichte des Solidaritätsbegriffs im Strafrecht. Hirsch, A., Neumann, U., Seelmann, K. (Eds.), Solidarität im Strafrecht (pp. 35-49). Nomos Verlag.
Silva Sánchez, J. (2025). Derecho Penal. Parte general. Aranzadi La Ley.
Stammler, R. (1928). Lehrbuch der Rechtsphilosophie. Walter de Gruyter & Co.
Thompson, S. D. (1880). Homicide in self-defense. American Law Review, 14(8), 545-582.
Welzel, H. (2014). Derecho natural y positivismo jurídico. En Estudios de filosofía del derecho y derecho penal (Trad. Garzón Valdés, pp. 177-199). BdeF.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kevin Silva Carrillo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
License Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
This license allows the copy, distribution, exhibition and representation of the work provided authorship is acknowledged and the work is properly quoted. Commercial use of the original work or the generation of derived works are not allowed.
The authors hereby guarantee the right to the first publication of the work to the Revista Jurídica Austral.
